Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

Thursday, 2 March 2017

EXPERIMENTAL FILM

TREATMENT AND SYNOPSIS
Working Title: Times Changing


TIMES CHANGING 


Synopsis

This multi screen film features a character who on one screen symbolises repression and manipulation, in an Orwellian artificial bureaucratic setting. On the other screen we see the character expressing themselves freely in a setting in which anything is possible, exposed to a place of freedom and creativity, symbolised by the use of different filming locations or ways to create different settings, such as the place the character first enters; an alleyway.


Treatment/Shot list

Screen 1: A middle aged male character wearing dark plain neutral attire is seen in a office, sat at a desk, staring outwards. A dead plant sits in the corner of the room. The sound of a clock ticking can be heard and the character’s hand can be seen, typing at a computer. Everything about the scene is dull and dystopian.. Lont takes from different angles of the man and his unimpressed expression could be used to see the bland expression throughout all aspects of the character, from facial expression to body language. During moments of this screen story will be cut to a plain white wall, where the paint is drying. Another way to show this is the idea of watching paint dry, which can be interpreted by the shot of the wall, alternatively by the same wall with a ‘Wet paint - Do not touch’ sign; symbolising the idea that reality being as dull as watching paint dry. The phrase ‘Do not touch’ shows authority and that reality features a dictated and controlled society in which pressure dictates individuals choices. There could also be shots of a clock as it ticks, showing a source, different separated shots of the clock could show time progressing faster than it actually is, along with continuing tick of the clock which is steady and unchanging, representing the unchanging and repetitive aspect of life in this reality. The shots of the character could also pan outwards to show a want for this kind of reality to fade away, making room for a reality of freedom and change as well as the idea of living in a reality like this is to fade out of history, not making any sort of change.




Screen 2: On a separate screen at different times but sometimes overlapping, another reality will be shown. This reality starts out dark and unknowing and would be a first person point of view shot, as if looking for a way out, for change, freedom and a new way to live. This secondary screen transgresses the first screens themes. The character stumbles upon an alleyway which as a stereotype is often a dangerous place. However, in this reality he has freedom and the second screen explores the alleyway, because they can be whatever the character wants them to be. Therefore as we journey down the alley with this character we find all kinds of fun and crazy things that challenge the stereotype of a typical alley, which then becomes their escape, their reality, their creativity and their freedom; their imagination. Things that will be able to be seen in the alleyway will include vibrantly coloured lights and additional characters which will be doing all kinds of crazy things, wearing whatever they want and doing things that we may consider normal and or fun, yet in a confined and suppressed reality of control these things are considered wrong, representing a transgression and showing the character to be rebelling. One of these acts could be something as simple as using silly string or party poppers to represent an aspect of celebrating life and freedom but also giving a childlike aspect that shows that the character is lashing, wanting to be free, also represented by the bright colours, with all of these aspects also challenging stereotypes. As the character continues to progress the setting could possibly change and we can represent the idea of transgression and the thought process of the character through the use of colour, time as well as the structure of the film. The film will end by reaching a conclusion, a point that the character reaches in which they have fulfilled their goal of transgressing, and challenging the society and reality that we see them in through the first screen. This can be shown through time seeming to go a lot faster, showing that things are changing, only for everything to stop and for the character seen in the first screen to stand up and walk out of the room as if finally deciding to do something about that way of life and that reality, in a way seeming like everything shown on the first screen was a dream or the thoughts, wants and desires of the character, also implied by how bizarre everything seemingly is in this alternate reality which through this can symbolise a society in which freedom is celebrated but also the thoughts of a person living within the first reality.

The ideas behind this film are inspired by both the world around us, as well as an idea, a way that society could be. Not only this but also the thoughts of someone who desires freedom and/or change.
Hera are some inspirational videos we've looked at that have inspired us:


How to recognize a dystopia - Alex Gendler






What makes something "Kafkaesque"? - Noah Tavlin






What "Orwellian" really means - Noah Tavlin






Mind Control corporate espionage, Directed by Vincenzo Natali.






Equilibrium, Directed by Kurt Wimmer, 2002.



This intense, unsettling film draws heavily from George Orwell's classic, 1984. Writer/director Kurt Wimmer substitutes "Big Brother" for "Father," whose voice and features are projected across Libria on enormous television screens, constantly reminding people of the dangers of the natural human state and the devastation it had led to in earlier, less sophisticated societies. Where Orwell has "thought police," Wimmer has "sense police." States in Orwell's world subdue their populations by the need to maintain their war efforts, while Libria's justifies the abuse of its people through the notion of sustaining peace.                                                                  
                                                                                                               -Nell Minow, Common sense media.







BIBLIOGRAPHY 


- How to recognize a dystopia - Alex Gendler:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6a6kbU88wu0\


-What makes something "Kafkaesque"? - Noah Tavlin:



-What "Orwellian" really means - Noah Tavlin



-Mind Control scene from Cypher directed by Vincenzo Natali, 2002 : 



-Equilibrium, Directed by Kurt Wimmer, 2002 :





Sunday, 12 February 2017

EXPERIMENTAL FILM

CONTEMPORARY FILM - TRUMP






The purpose of this short film is to touch down on the situation thats been happening over across the atlantic and the recent protests against America's 45th President Donald Trump. Considering Trump is the most talked about issue of late with his new foreign and domestic policies, I wanted to comment visually by merging the protesters against the voice of Trump. Personally I liked the contrast this film created with what we see on the news and how American society depicts him. In my short video those who stand against Trump, silenced by the overwhelming voice which is ironic as Trump being the leader and spokesmen for his country is meant to be singular voice speaking on behalf of his people to the world. 

The image below is my own propaganda pieces made to accompany the short contemporary film about the conflict today with Donald Trump. I used the Statue of Liberty because it signifies freedom and felt this was a interesting contrast to play upon. To complete the propaganda piece I added elements of trump to symbolise control over freedom which relates back to his immigration bans and Mexican wall policies. 





Monday, 7 November 2016

CODE OF CONDUCT


THIS CODE OF CONDUCT IS A SET OF GUIDELINES DESIGNED TO SAFEGUARD THE PRACTICES OF THE PRODUCTION TEAM AND THEIR AFFILIATES DURING ALL HOURS OF FILMING.



Introduction

As part of the production team we must be committed to becoming an effective team and providing an experienced and enjoyful atmosphere to all of our team members. Whilst in the production team the following rules must apply and at all times be referred to, if necessary.


General principles

  • Any activity that threatens the safety of our team members is strictly prohibited.
  • Any activity that threatens the wellbeing of the general public or our contributors is strictly prohibited.
  • Any activity that threatens the environment upon the location of filming without proper authorised consent is Prohibited.
  • Any activity that will interfere with property owners, general public or tenants, without the proper consent or awareness is prohibited.

FURTHERMORE THOSE EXAMPLES OF MISCONDUCT THAT IS PROHIBITED WILL NOT BE LIMITED TO.

  • Inappropriate profanity, vulgar or threatening language to peers, co-workers or the general public is strictly prohibited.
  • Any disorderly misconduct on all premises is strictly prohibited.
  • Operating any unauthorised or unapproved equipment taken or without a fellow team members acknowledgement is strictly prohibited.


THOSE WHO PERSIST TO DISRUPT, OR ANY INDIVIDUAL THAT DOES NOT ACT RESPONSIBLY WITHIN THE PRODUCTION TEAM BOTH PUBLICLY AND PRIVATELY, MAY BE ASKED TO LEAVE UNTIL READY TO DO SO. IF DISRUPTION CONTINUES THEN FURTHER ACTIONS WILL BE TAKEN, DEPENDING ON THE SEVERITY OF THEIR ACTIONS.




NAME_______________________                                                    

DATE______________________                                          SIGNATURE__________________

THE ETHICS OF REPRESENTATION

Reflective work on Ethics workshop.


As film makers it is our responsibility to ensure that both the film crew and the film footage abides by the rules and regulations set by the ethical code. There are specific points we must consider when working with contributors, especially contributors who may not be able to give consent under usual circumstances due to not being physically or mentally able.

Firstly, are they able to give informed consent and are they aware of the consequences of being filmed. An example of this can be the contributors losing a sense of privacy because they are willingly consenting to viewers having insight into their lives. How may they be affected by the process of filming, how will they be perceived and how truthful will they be portrayed, will it be true to their nature? One critical point when dealing with various contributors of all ages is Children. When documenting a film based on or featuring children, an entirely different criteria for consent is needed.


BBC'S CHILD CONSENT PROTOCOL 


If you wish to learn more about the children protection guidelines of filming with children, click the link below;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/howwework/policiesandguidelines/child_protection.html

Or if you wish to know more about editorial guidelines of consent in general, click here;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines



In most cases the go to contributor to receive consent would be the parents or guardian of the child. However, how do you gain permission from a mother or father who is suffering from mental health issues or addictions? Trying to gain the consent from a parent in this capacity, especially if they are sole parents, is a much more complex and tricky circumstance that will not always have a direct solution. Nonetheless, whenever possible the best answer I can give, as far as I'm aware, would be to seek the permission of the social worker that might be working in the child's best interests or further lengths would be to go to the family doctor to determine if filming will affect the health of the parent or the child.


'SOCIAL WORKER' BY ANNE PARISIO - Figure 1


One documentary that is a good example of this situation being faced was 'Social Workers.' Which is part of a series by Anne Parisio. A task we were given in our production teams was to analyse and evaluate our responsibilities within the film. When watching the clip from the 'Social Workers', it seemed to demonstrate that the actual social workers had the majority of power over the family dealing with issues. 

It is true that as a spectator and observer we must also respect the privacy and emotions of the contributors. This allows control to be given to the contributors on how they would like to be portrayed. Naturally when discussing the documentary it provides an insight into what we will be doing for the contributors, this is to hopefully convey the message we want to send across to our viewers and often tends to help the 'permission to film' be negotiated easier.

When filming, we must avoid any complications that would prevent us from shooting the crucial moments because that is where the most tension occurs. In the clip seen in Figure 1, the crucial moment would be the moment where the mother has acknowledged her incapacity to care for her child whilst facing complicating health problems. This moment creates sympathy which allows an emotional connection to be established between the viewer and the mother. Why people might agree to be filmed is unclear but perhaps it would be primarily to build an understanding of the situation within the outside world, or perhaps in the hopes it could create closure for the individual if more people were to comprehend the situation.

Making our documentaries we must consider our audience and ensure no defamation has taken place within the film. Our films must comply with all laws such as fairness, copyright protection, data protection, legal obligations and more. Doing so minimises the chances of a claim being made against the filmmakers or filming under false pretence.


Thank you for reading, if you'd like to leave a comment below please do so. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 


BBC'S child consent protocol-

http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/howwework/policiesandguidelines/child_protection.html


Clip image of the 'Social Worker' by Anne Parisio-

https://myuca.ucreative.ac.uk/webapps/blackboard/ethicsrepresentation/displayContent/mode/view&content

 people and processes short final